I agree that the imagery of “Venus and the Ark” is quite
elaborate. There is very a strong contrast between the way he
describes Venus and the way he describes Earth. When Anne Sexton
talks about Earth, she will often use very negative descriptions like
when she described the nuked planet as “a forgotten pitted stone.”
Venus on the other hand is described very cheerfully and
optimistically especially in the final stanza where all the animals
that the Doctors had released on the new planet are thriving.
One thing I found interesting while I was reading “Venus and the
Ark” was the obvious parallel to the Old Testament story, Noah's
Ark. In the old story, God
decides that man has become corrupt and that it is necessary to wipe
out all life on Earth with a great flood. Noah, who God sees as
untainted by the wickedness of man, is instructed to build a great
ship to survive the flood. After constructing the Ark and gathering a
pair of each animal, the flood comes and covers the Earth. When the
waters recede, Noah, his family, and the animals are left to
repopulate the now clean Earth. I feel that the parallels to Anne
Sexton's story are blatantly obvious. I find it interesting that
instead of the human population being condemned by one man (God in
the Noah's Ark story), Earth and the human population destroyed
itself with its own hate and wickedness. While the poem can be seen
negatively because of the destruction of the Earth, I feel that the
poem ends on a positive note. As the two scientists die, they leave a
beautiful world sprawling with the animals they brought with them
from Earth with hopes that the future generations of these creatures
will not make the same mistakes that humanity made. It is a second
chance on another planet for life to prosper. Did anyone else get
this feeling as they finished the poem?
No comments:
Post a Comment